Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host vs VITURE Luma XR
Side-by-side comparison of specs, features, and pricing
Specs updated
Which should you buy?
Bottom line: the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host is the better buy for most people at $160 less, unless you need the lighter fit.
We may earn a commission on purchases made through links on this page.
Buy the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host if…
- You want to spend $160 less ($239 vs $399)
Buy the VITURE Luma XR if…
- You want the lighter 77g fit (vs 181g)
- You wear prescription lenses
- You want spatial audio
- You want adjustable lens dimming
Verdict generated from the recorded spec differences shown in the table below — when a spec is missing for either product, it is left out rather than guessed.
See the full rankings
Specs Comparison
Specs last verified
| Specification |  Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host $239 |  VITURE Luma XR $399 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Price | $239 | $399 |
| Display | ||
| Display type | None (host device; capacitive touch panel for control) | Sony Micro-OLED (enhanced panels, 50% sharper than VITURE Pro) |
| Resolution | — | 1920x1200 |
| Field of view (°) | — | 50 |
| Refresh rate (Hz) | — | 120 |
| Brightness (nits) | — | 1000 |
| Virtual screen size (in) | — | 146 |
| HDR support | — | ✕ No |
| Color support | Full color | Full color |
| Optics | ||
| Optics type | — | birdbath |
| Dimming control | — | ✓ Yes |
| Transparency level | — | electrochromic film (0.5-40% transmittance) |
| Prescription support | — | ✓ Yes |
| Diopter range | — | 0.00 to -6.00 |
| Physical | ||
| Weight (g) | 181 | 77 |
| Frame style | — | wraparound |
| Color options | — | Translucent Black |
| Foldable | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life (hours) | 5 | — |
| Charging method | — | USB-C (powered by connected device) |
| Connectivity | ||
| Connectivity | USB-C | USB-C |
| Tethered | — | ✓ Yes |
| Compatible devices | Rokid Max 2, Rokid Max | Android, iOS, PC, Mac, Steam Deck, Nintendo Switch, PlayStation, Xbox, ROG Ally |
| Computing | ||
| Processing type | — | tethered |
| Operating system | YodaOS-Master with spatial browser | iPhone, Android, Mac, PC, Steam Deck, Switch/Switch 2 (via adapters) |
| Chipset | 8GB RAM, 128GB storage | None on-device (host-powered; SpaceWalker app ecosystem) |
| Sensors & input | ||
| Camera | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Microphones | — | 2 |
| Speakers | open-ear | directional · spatial audio |
| Tracking | — | 3DoF |
Buy the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host
Buy the VITURE Luma XR
Keep shopping
Jump straight to full specs and where to buy either model, or keep exploring related picks.
More ways to decide
All Rokid vs VITURE comparisons
Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host vs VITURE Luma XR: FAQs
Which is newer: the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host or the VITURE Luma XR?
The VITURE Luma XR is newer, released September 2025, versus January 2025 for the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host.
Which is cheaper: the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host or the VITURE Luma XR?
The Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host costs $239 and the VITURE Luma XR costs $399, making the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host $160 cheaper.
Which is lighter: the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host or the VITURE Luma XR?
The VITURE Luma XR is lighter at 77g. The Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host weighs 181g and the VITURE Luma XR weighs 77g.
What is the main difference between the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host and the VITURE Luma XR?
Based on recorded specs, the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host leads on price ($160 cheaper) while the VITURE Luma XR leads on weight (104g lighter).