Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host vs VITURE Beast XR Glasses
Side-by-side comparison of specs, features, and pricing
Specs updated
Which should you buy?
Bottom line: the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host is the better buy for most people at $310 less, unless you need the lighter fit.
We may earn a commission on purchases made through links on this page.
Buy the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host if…
- You want to spend $310 less ($239 vs $549)
Buy the VITURE Beast XR Glasses if…
- You want the lighter 88g fit (vs 181g)
- You want a built-in camera
- You wear prescription lenses
- You want adjustable lens dimming
Verdict generated from the recorded spec differences shown in the table below — when a spec is missing for either product, it is left out rather than guessed.
See the full rankings
Specs Comparison
Specs last verified
| Specification |  Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host $239 |  VITURE Beast XR Glasses $549 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Price | $239 | $549 |
| Display | ||
| Display type | None (host device; capacitive touch panel for control) | Sony latest-gen Micro-OLED optical engine with VITURE exclusive optics |
| Resolution | — | 1920x1200 |
| Field of view (°) | — | 58 |
| Refresh rate (Hz) | — | 120 |
| Brightness (nits) | — | 1250 |
| Virtual screen size (in) | — | 174 |
| Color support | Full color | Full color |
| Optics | ||
| Optics type | — | birdbath |
| Dimming control | — | ✓ Yes |
| Prescription support | — | ✓ Yes |
| Diopter range | — | Prescription frame support (no built-in myopia dials) |
| Physical | ||
| Weight (g) | 181 | 88 |
| Foldable | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life (hours) | 5 | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Connectivity | USB-C | USB-C (DP Alt Mode) |
| Tethered | — | ✓ Yes |
| Compatible devices | Rokid Max 2, Rokid Max | Android, iOS, PC, Mac, Steam Deck, Nintendo Switch 2, PlayStation, Xbox, ROG Ally, Lenovo Legion Go, Samsung DeX, iPad |
| Computing | ||
| Operating system | YodaOS-Master with spatial browser | iOS, Android, Windows, macOS, consoles/handhelds |
| Chipset | 8GB RAM, 128GB storage | None on-device (host-powered; SpaceWalker ecosystem) |
| Sensors & input | ||
| Camera | ✕ No | RGB |
| Speakers | open-ear | open-ear |
| Tracking | — | 3DoF |
Buy the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host
Buy the VITURE Beast XR Glasses
Keep shopping
Jump straight to full specs and where to buy either model, or keep exploring related picks.
More ways to decide
All Rokid vs VITURE comparisons
Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host vs VITURE Beast XR Glasses: FAQs
Which is newer: the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host or the VITURE Beast XR Glasses?
The VITURE Beast XR Glasses is newer, released December 2025, versus January 2025 for the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host.
Which is cheaper: the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host or the VITURE Beast XR Glasses?
The Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host costs $239 and the VITURE Beast XR Glasses costs $549, making the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host $310 cheaper.
Which is lighter: the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host or the VITURE Beast XR Glasses?
The VITURE Beast XR Glasses is lighter at 88g. The Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host weighs 181g and the VITURE Beast XR Glasses weighs 88g.
What is the main difference between the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host and the VITURE Beast XR Glasses?
Based on recorded specs, the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host leads on price ($310 cheaper) while the VITURE Beast XR Glasses leads on weight (93g lighter).