Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host vs VITURE Luma Ultra XR/AR Glasses
Side-by-side comparison of specs, features, and pricing
Specs updated
Which should you buy?
Bottom line: the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host is the better buy for most people at $360 less, unless you need the lighter fit.
We may earn a commission on purchases made through links on this page.
Buy the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host if…
- You want to spend $360 less ($239 vs $599)
Buy the VITURE Luma Ultra XR/AR Glasses if…
- You want the lighter 83g fit (vs 181g)
- You wear prescription lenses
- You want adjustable lens dimming
- You play on Steam Deck
Verdict generated from the recorded spec differences shown in the table below — when a spec is missing for either product, it is left out rather than guessed.
See the full rankings
Specs Comparison
Specs last verified
| Specification |  Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host $239 |  VITURE Luma Ultra XR/AR Glasses $599 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Price | $239 | $599 |
| Display | ||
| Display type | None (host device; capacitive touch panel for control) | Sony Micro-OLED (latest-gen panels) |
| Resolution | — | 1920x1200 |
| Field of view (°) | — | 52 |
| Refresh rate (Hz) | — | 120 |
| Brightness (nits) | — | 1500 |
| Virtual screen size (in) | — | 152 |
| Color support | Full color | Full color |
| Optics | ||
| Optics type | — | birdbath |
| Dimming control | — | ✓ Yes |
| Prescription support | — | ✓ Yes |
| Diopter range | — | Built-in myopia adjustment up to -4.0D; clip-on Rx frame for astigmatism/hyperopia (SPH -16 to +12, CYL 6) |
| Physical | ||
| Weight (g) | 181 | 83 |
| Foldable | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life (hours) | 5 | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Connectivity | USB-C | USB-C (DP Alt Mode) |
| Compatible devices | Rokid Max 2, Rokid Max | Android, iOS, PC, Mac, Steam Deck, Nintendo Switch 2, PlayStation, Xbox, ROG Ally, Lenovo Legion Go, iPad |
| Computing | ||
| Operating system | YodaOS-Master with spatial browser | iPhone, Android, Mac, PC, Switch/Switch 2, Steam Deck |
| Chipset | 8GB RAM, 128GB storage | Host-powered (6DoF works on Pro Neckband, macOS, Windows via SpaceWalker) |
| Sensors & input | ||
| Camera | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Speakers | open-ear | open-ear |
| Tracking | — | 6DoF |
Buy the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host
Buy the VITURE Luma Ultra XR/AR Glasses
Keep shopping
Jump straight to full specs and where to buy either model, or keep exploring related picks.
More ways to decide
All Rokid vs VITURE comparisons
Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host vs VITURE Luma Ultra XR/AR Glasses: FAQs
Which is newer: the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host or the VITURE Luma Ultra XR/AR Glasses?
The VITURE Luma Ultra XR/AR Glasses is newer, released August 2025, versus January 2025 for the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host.
Which is cheaper: the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host or the VITURE Luma Ultra XR/AR Glasses?
The Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host costs $239 and the VITURE Luma Ultra XR/AR Glasses costs $599, making the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host $360 cheaper.
Which is lighter: the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host or the VITURE Luma Ultra XR/AR Glasses?
The VITURE Luma Ultra XR/AR Glasses is lighter at 83g. The Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host weighs 181g and the VITURE Luma Ultra XR/AR Glasses weighs 83g.
What is the main difference between the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host and the VITURE Luma Ultra XR/AR Glasses?
Based on recorded specs, the Rokid Station 2 Spatial Computing Host leads on price ($360 cheaper) while the VITURE Luma Ultra XR/AR Glasses leads on weight (98g lighter).