RayNeo Air 3s Pro AR/XR Glasses vs RayNeo GT
Side-by-side comparison of specs, features, and pricing
Specs updated
Why RayNeo Air 3s Pro AR/XR Glasses is better
No measurable advantages found.
Why RayNeo GT is better
- Weight: 8g lighter (68 vs 76)
- HDR Support: Supports HDR (Yes vs No)
Specs Comparison
| Specification | | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Price | $299 | $299 |
| Display | ||
| Display type | Sony 0.6" tandem Micro-OLED (5.5th-gen, HueView 2.0) | Micro-OLED (Vision 4000 display chip) |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | — |
| Pixels per degree | 42 | — |
| Field of view (°) | 46 | 46 |
| Refresh rate (Hz) | 120 | 120 |
| Brightness (nits) | 1200 | 1200 |
| Virtual screen size (in) | 201 | 201 |
| HDR support | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
| Color support | Full color | Full color |
| Optics | ||
| Optics type | birdbath | birdbath |
| Dimming control | ✓ Yes | ✕ No |
| Prescription support | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Diopter range | Prescription lens frame support (lenses separate) | Magnetic prescription inserts |
| Physical | ||
| Weight (g) | 76 | 68 |
| Foldable | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Connectivity | USB-C (DP Alt Mode) | — |
| Tethered | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Computing | ||
| Operating system | None (plug-and-play external display); optional RayNeo Pocket TV host | — |
| Chipset | None (tethered display glasses) | — |
| Sensors & input | ||
| Camera | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Speakers | open-ear · spatial audio | open-ear · spatial audio |
| Tracking | 0DoF | 3DoF, Zone 360 3DoF chip (Pinned/Steady/Follow viewing modes) |
| Gesture control | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Voice control | ✕ No | ✕ No |
Buy the RayNeo Air 3s Pro AR/XR Glasses
Buy the RayNeo GT
Keep shopping
Jump straight to full specs and where to buy either model, or keep exploring related picks.