Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Rokid AR Spatial
Side-by-side comparison of specs, features, and pricing
Specs updated
Which should you buy?
Bottom line: the Microsoft HoloLens 2 is the better buy for most people, unless you need the lighter fit.
We may earn a commission on purchases made through links on this page.
Buy the Microsoft HoloLens 2 if…
- You want smoother 120Hz motion (vs 90Hz)
- You need full 6DoF positional tracking
- You want a built-in camera
- You want spatial audio
Buy the Rokid AR Spatial if…
- You want the lighter 75g fit (vs 566g)
- You need longer battery life (5 hours vs 2.5)
Verdict generated from the recorded spec differences shown in the table below — when a spec is missing for either product, it is left out rather than guessed.
See the full rankings
Specs Comparison
Specs last verified
| Specification | | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Price | Contact manufacturer | $558 |
| Display | ||
| Display type | See-through holographic waveguide lenses, 2k 3:2 light engines (laser-scanned MEMS) | Sony 0.68" Micro-OLED (Max 2 glasses) |
| Resolution | 2048x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Pixels per degree | 47 | 38 |
| Field of view (°) | 52 | 50 |
| Refresh rate (Hz) | 120 | 90 |
| Brightness (nits) | — | 600 |
| Virtual screen size (in) | — | 300 |
| HDR support | ✕ No | — |
| Color support | Full color | Full color |
| Optics | ||
| Optics type | waveguide | birdbath |
| Dimming control | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Transparency level | see-through AR overlay | — |
| Prescription support | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Diopter range | Fits over eyeglasses | Built-in myopia adjustment 0 to -6.00D |
| Physical | ||
| Weight (g) | 566 | 75 |
| Frame style | headband visor | glasses |
| Color options | Black | — |
| Foldable | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life (hours) | 2.5 | 5 |
| Charging method | USB-C | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Connectivity | Bluetooth 5.0, WiFi 5, WiFi 6, USB-C | USB-C |
| Tethered | ✕ No | — |
| Compatible devices | Standalone, Windows | Rokid Station 2 |
| Computing | ||
| Processing type | on-device | — |
| Operating system | Windows Holographic OS (Windows 10-based; final feature release 24H1, Nov 2024) | YodaOS-Master (Android-app compatible) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 + 2nd-gen custom Holographic Processing Unit (HPU), 4GB LPDDR4x, 64GB UFS 2.1 (untethered) | Rokid Station 2: 8GB RAM / 128GB storage, 5000 mAh |
| Sensors & input | ||
| Camera | 8MP (5×) | ✕ No |
| Microphones | 5 | — |
| Speakers | directional · spatial audio | open-ear |
| Tracking | 6DoF, head, eye, hand, SLAM | 3DoF |
| Gesture control | ✓ Yes | — |
| Voice control | ✓ Yes | — |
| AI assistant | Cortana | — |
Buy the Microsoft HoloLens 2
Buy the Rokid AR Spatial
Keep shopping
Jump straight to full specs and where to buy either model, or keep exploring related picks.
More ways to decide
Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Rokid AR Spatial: FAQs
Which is newer: the Microsoft HoloLens 2 or the Rokid AR Spatial?
The Rokid AR Spatial is newer, released January 2025, versus November 2019 for the Microsoft HoloLens 2.
Which has the larger field of view: the Microsoft HoloLens 2 or the Rokid AR Spatial?
The Microsoft HoloLens 2 has the larger field of view: Microsoft HoloLens 2 measures 52 degrees vs 50 degrees for the Rokid AR Spatial.
Which is lighter: the Microsoft HoloLens 2 or the Rokid AR Spatial?
The Rokid AR Spatial is lighter at 75g. The Microsoft HoloLens 2 weighs 566g and the Rokid AR Spatial weighs 75g.
What is the main difference between the Microsoft HoloLens 2 and the Rokid AR Spatial?
Based on recorded specs, the Microsoft HoloLens 2 leads on field of view (2 degrees wider FOV) while the Rokid AR Spatial leads on weight (491g lighter).

