VITURE Beast XR Glasses vs VITURE Luma Pro
Side-by-side comparison of specs, features, and pricing
Why VITURE Beast XR Glasses is better
- Field of View: 6 degrees wider FOV (58 vs 52)
- Brightness: 250 nits brighter (1250 vs 1000)
Why VITURE Luma Pro is better
- Price: $50 cheaper (499 vs 549)
- Weight: 9g lighter (79 vs 88)
Specs Comparison
| Specification | | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Price | $549 | $499 |
| Display | ||
| Display type | Sony latest-gen Micro-OLED optical engine with VITURE exclusive optics | Sony Micro-OLED (50% sharper than VITURE Pro) |
| Resolution | 1920x1200 | 1920x1200 |
| Field of view (°) | 58 | 52 |
| Refresh rate (Hz) | 120 | 120 |
| Brightness (nits) | 1250 | 1000 |
| Virtual screen size (in) | 174 | 152 |
| HDR support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Color support | Full color | Full color |
| Optics | ||
| Optics type | birdbath | birdbath |
| Dimming control | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Prescription support | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Diopter range | Prescription frame support (no built-in myopia dials) | Built-in myopia adjustment up to -4.0D; tilt-adjustable arms |
| Physical | ||
| Weight (g) | 88 | 79 |
| Frame style | — | glasses |
| Foldable | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Connectivity | USB-C (DP Alt Mode) | USB-C (DP Alt Mode) |
| Tethered | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
| Computing | ||
| Processing type | — | tethered |
| Operating system | iOS, Android, Windows, macOS, consoles/handhelds | iPhone, Android, Mac, PC, Steam Deck, Switch/Switch 2 |
| Chipset | None on-device (host-powered; SpaceWalker ecosystem) | None on-device (host-powered; SpaceWalker ecosystem) |
| Sensors & input | ||
| Camera | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Speakers | open-ear | open-ear |
| Tracking | 3DoF | 3DoF |
| Gesture control | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Voice control | ✕ No | ✕ No |