Rokid Max 2 vs TCL NxtWear S
Side-by-side comparison of specs, features, and pricing
Why Rokid Max 2 is better
- Weight: 14g lighter (75 vs 89)
- Field of View: 5 degrees wider FOV (50 vs 45)
- Refresh Rate: 60Hz faster refresh rate (120 vs 60)
- Brightness: 200 nits brighter (600 vs 400)
Why TCL NxtWear S is better
- Pixel Density: 11 PPD higher pixel density (49 vs 38)
Specs Comparison
| Specification |  Rokid Max 2 $399 |  TCL NxtWear S $399 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Price | $399 | $399 |
| Display | ||
| Display type | Sony 0.68" Micro-OLED | Sony Micro-OLED |
| Resolution | 1920x1200 | 1920x1080 |
| Pixels per degree | 38 | 49 |
| Field of view (°) | 50 | 45 |
| Refresh rate (Hz) | 120 | 60 |
| Brightness (nits) | 600 | 400 |
| Virtual screen size (in) | 215 | 130 |
| HDR support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Color support | Full color | Full color |
| Optics | ||
| Optics type | birdbath | birdbath |
| Dimming control | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Transparency level | — | electrochromic (adjustable tint) |
| Prescription support | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Diopter range | 0.00 to -6.00 | Prescription inserts available |
| Physical | ||
| Weight (g) | 75 | 89 |
| Frame style | wraparound | wraparound |
| Color options | Night Black, Dawn Silver | Dark Gray |
| Foldable | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Charging method | USB-C (powered by connected device) | USB-C (powered by connected device) |
| Connectivity | ||
| Connectivity | USB-C | USB-C |
| Tethered | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Compatible devices | Android, iOS, PC, Mac, Steam Deck, ROG Ally, Nintendo Switch, PlayStation, Xbox | Android, iOS, PC, Mac, Steam Deck, ROG Ally, PlayStation, Xbox, Nintendo Switch |
| Computing | ||
| Processing type | tethered | tethered |
| Operating system | None standalone; YodaOS-Master via Rokid Station 2 | — |
| Chipset | None (tethered display glasses) | — |
| Sensors & input | ||
| Camera | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Microphones | 1 | 2 |
| Speakers | directional | open-ear |
| Gesture control | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Voice control | ✕ No | ✕ No |