Magic Leap 2 vs Rokid AR Spatial
Side-by-side comparison of specs, features, and pricing
Specs updated
Which should you buy?
Bottom line: the Magic Leap 2 is the better buy for most people, unless you need the lighter fit.
We may earn a commission on purchases made through links on this page.
Buy the Magic Leap 2 if…
- You want the wider 70° field of view (vs 50°)
- You need the brighter 2000-nit display (vs 600 nits)
- You want smoother 120Hz motion (vs 90Hz)
- You need full 6DoF positional tracking
Buy the Rokid AR Spatial if…
- You want the lighter 75g fit (vs 260g)
- You need longer battery life (5 hours vs 3.5)
Verdict generated from the recorded spec differences shown in the table below — when a spec is missing for either product, it is left out rather than guessed.
See the full rankings
Specs Comparison
Specs last verified
| Specification |  Magic Leap 2 Contact manufacturer |  Rokid AR Spatial $558 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Price | Contact manufacturer | $558 |
| Display | ||
| Display type | Diffractive waveguide with dynamic dimming, binocular see-through | Sony 0.68" Micro-OLED (Max 2 glasses) |
| Resolution | 1440x1760 | 1920x1080 |
| Pixels per degree | — | 38 |
| Field of view (°) | 70 | 50 |
| Refresh rate (Hz) | 120 | 90 |
| Brightness (nits) | 2000 | 600 |
| Virtual screen size (in) | — | 300 |
| HDR support | ✕ No | — |
| Color support | Full color | Full color |
| Optics | ||
| Optics type | waveguide | birdbath |
| Dimming control | ✓ Yes | ✕ No |
| Transparency level | dynamic dimming (0-100%) | — |
| Prescription support | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Diopter range | Prescription inserts available | Built-in myopia adjustment 0 to -6.00D |
| Physical | ||
| Weight (g) | 260 | 75 |
| Frame style | visor with headband | glasses |
| Color options | Black | — |
| Foldable | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life (hours) | 3.5 | 5 |
| Charging method | USB-C | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Connectivity | Bluetooth 5.0, WiFi 6, WiFi 6E, USB-C | USB-C |
| Tethered | ✕ No | — |
| Compatible devices | Standalone | Rokid Station 2 |
| Computing | ||
| Processing type | on-device | — |
| Operating system | Android AOSP-based (ML OS); OpenXR, Unity, Unreal support | YodaOS-Master (Android-app compatible) |
| Chipset | Tethered Compute Pack (425 g): AMD quad-core Zen 2 x86, 16GB RAM, 256GB storage | Rokid Station 2: 8GB RAM / 128GB storage, 5000 mAh |
| Sensors & input | ||
| Camera | 12.6MP (9×) | ✕ No |
| Microphones | 4 | — |
| Speakers | directional · spatial audio | open-ear |
| Tracking | 6DoF, head, eye, hand, SLAM | 3DoF |
| Gesture control | ✓ Yes | — |
| Voice control | ✓ Yes | — |
Buy the Magic Leap 2
Buy the Rokid AR Spatial
Keep shopping
Jump straight to full specs and where to buy either model, or keep exploring related picks.
Magic Leap 2 vs Rokid AR Spatial: FAQs
Which is newer: the Magic Leap 2 or the Rokid AR Spatial?
The Rokid AR Spatial is newer, released January 2025, versus September 2022 for the Magic Leap 2.
Which has the larger field of view: the Magic Leap 2 or the Rokid AR Spatial?
The Magic Leap 2 has the larger field of view: Magic Leap 2 measures 70 degrees vs 50 degrees for the Rokid AR Spatial.
Which is lighter: the Magic Leap 2 or the Rokid AR Spatial?
The Rokid AR Spatial is lighter at 75g. The Magic Leap 2 weighs 260g and the Rokid AR Spatial weighs 75g.
Which has the brighter display: the Magic Leap 2 or the Rokid AR Spatial?
The Magic Leap 2 is brighter at 2000 nits (Magic Leap 2: 2000 nits, Rokid AR Spatial: 600 nits).
What is the main difference between the Magic Leap 2 and the Rokid AR Spatial?
Based on recorded specs, the Magic Leap 2 leads on field of view (20 degrees wider FOV) while the Rokid AR Spatial leads on weight (185g lighter).