Lenovo ThinkReality A3 vs Rokid AR Spatial
Side-by-side comparison of specs, features, and pricing
Specs updated
Which should you buy?
Bottom line: the Rokid AR Spatial is the better buy for most people, unless you need 6DoF positional tracking.
We may earn a commission on purchases made through links on this page.
Buy the Lenovo ThinkReality A3 if…
- You need full 6DoF positional tracking
- You want a built-in camera
- You want adjustable lens dimming
Buy the Rokid AR Spatial if…
- You want the wider 50° field of view (vs 40°)
- You want the lighter 75g fit (vs 130g)
- You want smoother 90Hz motion (vs 60Hz)
Verdict generated from the recorded spec differences shown in the table below — when a spec is missing for either product, it is left out rather than guessed.
See the full rankings
Specs Comparison
Specs last verified
| Specification |  Lenovo ThinkReality A3 Contact manufacturer |  Rokid AR Spatial $558 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Price | Contact manufacturer | $558 |
| Display | ||
| Display type | Stereoscopic binocular 1080p displays (birdbath optics) | Sony 0.68" Micro-OLED (Max 2 glasses) |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Pixels per degree | — | 38 |
| Field of view (°) | 40 | 50 |
| Refresh rate (Hz) | 60 | 90 |
| Brightness (nits) | — | 600 |
| Virtual screen size (in) | — | 300 |
| HDR support | ✕ No | — |
| Color support | Full color | Full color |
| Optics | ||
| Optics type | birdbath | birdbath |
| Dimming control | ✓ Yes | ✕ No |
| Transparency level | see-through AR overlay | — |
| Prescription support | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Diopter range | Prescription insert frame support; swappable nosepieces and ear-horn extensions | Built-in myopia adjustment 0 to -6.00D |
| Physical | ||
| Weight (g) | 130 | 75 |
| Frame style | tethered glasses | glasses |
| Color options | Black | — |
| Foldable | ✓ Yes | ✕ No |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life (hours) | — | 5 |
| Charging method | USB-C (powered by host device) | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Connectivity | USB-C 3.2 Gen 1, DisplayPort 1.4 | USB-C |
| Tethered | ✓ Yes | — |
| Compatible devices | Windows (select ThinkPad workstations), Motorola phones | Rokid Station 2 |
| Computing | ||
| Processing type | tethered | — |
| Operating system | ThinkReality platform (Industrial Edition, Android host) / Windows 10-11 (PC Edition) | YodaOS-Master (Android-app compatible) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon XR1 onboard co-processing; host compute from tethered PC/phone | Rokid Station 2: 8GB RAM / 128GB storage, 5000 mAh |
| Sensors & input | ||
| Camera | 8MP (3×) | ✕ No |
| Microphones | 3 | — |
| Speakers | open-ear | open-ear |
| Tracking | 6DoF, head, SLAM | 3DoF |
Buy the Lenovo ThinkReality A3
Buy the Rokid AR Spatial
Keep shopping
Jump straight to full specs and where to buy either model, or keep exploring related picks.
More ways to decide
Lenovo ThinkReality A3 vs Rokid AR Spatial: FAQs
Which is newer: the Lenovo ThinkReality A3 or the Rokid AR Spatial?
The Rokid AR Spatial is newer, released January 2025, versus June 2021 for the Lenovo ThinkReality A3.
Which has the larger field of view: the Lenovo ThinkReality A3 or the Rokid AR Spatial?
The Rokid AR Spatial has the larger field of view: Lenovo ThinkReality A3 measures 40 degrees vs 50 degrees for the Rokid AR Spatial.
Which is lighter: the Lenovo ThinkReality A3 or the Rokid AR Spatial?
The Rokid AR Spatial is lighter at 75g. The Lenovo ThinkReality A3 weighs 130g and the Rokid AR Spatial weighs 75g.
What is the main difference between the Lenovo ThinkReality A3 and the Rokid AR Spatial?
Based on recorded specs, the Lenovo ThinkReality A3 leads on camera (Has built-in camera) while the Rokid AR Spatial leads on weight (55g lighter).