Dream Glass Flow vs VITURE Beast XR Glasses
Side-by-side comparison of specs, features, and pricing
Why Dream Glass Flow is better
- Price: $160 cheaper (389 vs 549)
- Weight: 29g lighter (59 vs 88)
Why VITURE Beast XR Glasses is better
- Refresh Rate: 60Hz faster refresh rate (120 vs 60)
- Brightness: 750 nits brighter (1250 vs 500)
- Prescription Support: Supports prescription lenses (Yes vs No)
Specs Comparison
| Specification |  Dream Glass Flow $389 |  VITURE Beast XR Glasses $549 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Price | $389 | $549 |
| Display | ||
| Display type | AR display | Sony latest-gen Micro-OLED optical engine with VITURE exclusive optics |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1200 |
| Field of view (°) | — | 58 |
| Refresh rate (Hz) | 60 | 120 |
| Brightness (nits) | 500 | 1250 |
| Virtual screen size (in) | — | 174 |
| HDR support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Color support | Full color | Full color |
| Optics | ||
| Optics type | — | birdbath |
| Dimming control | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Prescription support | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
| Diopter range | — | Prescription frame support (no built-in myopia dials) |
| Physical | ||
| Weight (g) | 59 | 88 |
| Frame style | glasses | — |
| Foldable | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Connectivity | HDMI, Wi-Fi 6 | USB-C (DP Alt Mode) |
| Tethered | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Computing | ||
| Operating system | — | iOS, Android, Windows, macOS, consoles/handhelds |
| Chipset | Gaming processor | None on-device (host-powered; SpaceWalker ecosystem) |
| Sensors & input | ||
| Camera | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Speakers | open-ear | open-ear |
| Tracking | — | 3DoF |
| Gesture control | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Voice control | ✕ No | ✕ No |