TCL NxtWear S vs TCL NXTWEAR S+ AR Glasses
Side-by-side comparison of specs, features, and pricing
Why TCL NxtWear S is better
No measurable advantages found.
Why TCL NXTWEAR S+ AR Glasses is better
- Price: $149 cheaper (250 vs 399)
- Weight: 2g lighter (87 vs 89)
- Refresh Rate: 60Hz faster refresh rate (120 vs 60)
- Brightness: 200 nits brighter (600 vs 400)
Specs Comparison
| Specification |  TCL NxtWear S $399 |  TCL NXTWEAR S+ AR Glasses $250 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Price | $399 | $250 |
| Display | ||
| Display type | Sony Micro-OLED | Dual Micro-OLED |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Pixels per degree | 49 | — |
| Field of view (°) | 45 | — |
| Refresh rate (Hz) | 60 | 120 |
| Brightness (nits) | 400 | 600 |
| Virtual screen size (in) | 130 | 215 |
| HDR support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Color support | Full color | Full color |
| Optics | ||
| Optics type | birdbath | birdbath |
| Dimming control | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Transparency level | electrochromic (adjustable tint) | — |
| Prescription support | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Diopter range | Prescription inserts available | Prescription lens frame accessory |
| Physical | ||
| Weight (g) | 89 | 87 |
| Frame style | wraparound | — |
| Color options | Dark Gray | — |
| Foldable | ✓ Yes | ✕ No |
| Battery & power | ||
| Charging method | USB-C (powered by connected device) | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Connectivity | USB-C | USB-C (DP Alt Mode) |
| Tethered | ✓ Yes | ✕ No |
| Compatible devices | Android, iOS, PC, Mac, Steam Deck, ROG Ally, PlayStation, Xbox, Nintendo Switch | — |
| Computing | ||
| Processing type | tethered | — |
| Operating system | — | None (plug-and-play external display) |
| Chipset | — | None (tethered display glasses) |
| Sensors & input | ||
| Camera | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Microphones | 2 | — |
| Speakers | open-ear | open-ear |
| Tracking | — | 0DoF |
| Gesture control | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Voice control | ✕ No | ✕ No |