Meta Ray-Ban Display vs RayNeo X3 Pro
Side-by-side comparison of specs, features, and pricing
Specs updated
Which should you buy?
Bottom line: the Meta Ray-Ban Display is the better buy for most people at $500 less, unless you need the wider field of view.
Untethered glasses with displays and cameras; the two 'full smart glasses' of 2025.
Buy the Meta Ray-Ban Display if…
- You want to spend $500 less ($799 vs $1299)
- You need the brighter 5000-nit display (vs 3500 nits)
- You want the lighter 69g fit (vs 76g)
- You need longer battery life (6 hours vs 1.5)
Buy the RayNeo X3 Pro if…
- You want the wider 30° field of view (vs 20°)
Verdict generated from the recorded spec differences shown in the table below — when a spec is missing for either product, it is left out rather than guessed.
Specs Comparison
| Specification |  Meta Ray-Ban Display $799 |  RayNeo X3 Pro $1,299 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Price | $799 | $1,299 |
| Display | ||
| Display type | full-color monocular waveguide display (right eye), LCoS light engine | Dual Micro-LED projectors, full color (16.77M colors) |
| Resolution | 600x600 | 640x480 |
| Pixels per degree | 42 | — |
| Field of view (°) | 20 | 30 |
| Refresh rate (Hz) | 90 | 60 |
| Brightness (nits) | 5000 | 3500 |
| Virtual screen size (in) | — | 43 |
| HDR support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Color support | Full color | Full color |
| Optics | ||
| Optics type | waveguide | waveguide |
| Dimming control | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Transparency level | — | see-through AR overlay |
| Prescription support | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Diopter range | -4.00 to +4.00 SPH+CYL, up to 4.00 CYL | Prescription lens inserts from $49 |
| Physical | ||
| Weight (g) | 69 | 76 |
| Frame style | wayfarer | titanium |
| Color options | Black, Sand | Black |
| Foldable | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| IP rating | IPX4 | IP52 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery life (hours) | 6 | 1.5 |
| Charging method | folding charging case (USB-C) | USB-C |
| Charging time (min) | — | 0.75 |
| Connectivity | ||
| Connectivity | Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi 6 | Bluetooth 5.3, WiFi 6, USB-C |
| Tethered | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Compatible devices | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
| Computing | ||
| Processing type | on-device | on-device |
| Operating system | Meta AI app (iOS/Android companion) | RayNeo AIOS with Google Gemini 2.5 AI |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon AR1 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon AR1 Gen 1, 4GB RAM, 32GB storage |
| Sensors & input | ||
| Camera | 12 MP, 1440x1920 video @30fps, 3X zoom | 12MP (2×) |
| Microphones | 5 | 3 |
| Speakers | open-ear | open-ear |
| Tracking | — | 6DoF, head, SLAM |
| Gesture control | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Voice control | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| AI assistant | Meta AI | Google Gemini |
Buy the Meta Ray-Ban Display
Buy the RayNeo X3 Pro
Keep shopping
Jump straight to full specs and where to buy either model, or keep exploring related picks.
More ways to decide
Meta Ray-Ban Display vs RayNeo X3 Pro: FAQs
Which is newer: the Meta Ray-Ban Display or the RayNeo X3 Pro?
The RayNeo X3 Pro is newer, released December 2025, versus September 2025 for the Meta Ray-Ban Display.
Which is cheaper: the Meta Ray-Ban Display or the RayNeo X3 Pro?
The Meta Ray-Ban Display costs $799 and the RayNeo X3 Pro costs $1299, making the Meta Ray-Ban Display $500 cheaper.
Which has the larger field of view: the Meta Ray-Ban Display or the RayNeo X3 Pro?
The RayNeo X3 Pro has the larger field of view: Meta Ray-Ban Display measures 20 degrees vs 30 degrees for the RayNeo X3 Pro.
Which is lighter: the Meta Ray-Ban Display or the RayNeo X3 Pro?
The Meta Ray-Ban Display is lighter at 69g. The Meta Ray-Ban Display weighs 69g and the RayNeo X3 Pro weighs 76g.
Which has the brighter display: the Meta Ray-Ban Display or the RayNeo X3 Pro?
The Meta Ray-Ban Display is brighter at 5000 nits (Meta Ray-Ban Display: 5000 nits, RayNeo X3 Pro: 3500 nits).
What is the main difference between the Meta Ray-Ban Display and the RayNeo X3 Pro?
Based on recorded specs, the Meta Ray-Ban Display leads on price ($500 cheaper) while the RayNeo X3 Pro leads on field of view (10 degrees wider FOV).