Inmo Air2 vs Mad Gaze Glow Plus
Side-by-side comparison of specs, features, and pricing
Why Inmo Air2 is better
- Weight: 7g lighter (85 vs 92)
- Refresh Rate: 30Hz faster refresh rate (90 vs 60)
Why Mad Gaze Glow Plus is better
- Price: $78 cheaper (521 vs 599)
- Field of View: 11 degrees wider FOV (53 vs 42)
- Gesture Control: Has gesture control (Yes vs No)
Specs Comparison
| Specification |  Inmo Air2 $599 |  Mad Gaze Glow Plus $521 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Price | $599 | $521 |
| Display | ||
| Display type | Micro-OLED | Micro-OLED |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Field of view (°) | 42 | 53 |
| Refresh rate (Hz) | 90 | 60 |
| Brightness (nits) | 800 | — |
| Virtual screen size (in) | — | 118 |
| HDR support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Color support | Full color | Full color |
| Optics | ||
| Optics type | — | birdbath |
| Dimming control | ✓ Yes | ✕ No |
| Transparency level | — | see-through (adjustable via app) |
| Prescription support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight (g) | 85 | 92 |
| Frame style | glasses | wraparound |
| Color options | — | Black |
| Foldable | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Charging method | — | USB-C (powered by connected device) |
| Connectivity | ||
| Connectivity | USB-C | USB-C, HDMI (via adapter) |
| Tethered | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
| Compatible devices | — | Android, PC, Mac, PlayStation, Xbox, Nintendo Switch |
| Computing | ||
| Processing type | — | tethered |
| Chipset | Ziguang Zhanrui AI | — |
| Sensors & input | ||
| Camera | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Microphones | — | 2 |
| Speakers | directional | directional |
| Tracking | 6DoF | 6DoF, SLAM |
| Gesture control | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
| Voice control | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |