# Inmo GO vs RealWear Navigator 520

Canonical comparison page: https://www.arcompare.com/compare/inmo-go-vs-realwear-navigator-520/
Specs updated: 2026-10-06 (the newer of the two products' update dates)
Source: AR Compare spec database (https://www.arcompare.com/data/). Unknown values are "—", never guessed.

**Bottom line: the Inmo GO is the better buy for most people at $2751 less, unless you need a built-in camera.**

- Buy the Inmo GO if you want to spend $2751 less ($399 vs $3150), you want the wider 40° field of view (vs 24°), and you want the lighter 82g fit (vs 270g).
- Buy the RealWear Navigator 520 if you want a built-in camera.

## Specifications

| Spec | Inmo GO | RealWear Navigator 520 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | $399 | $3,150 |
| Dimming control | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Prescription support | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Diopter range | Prescription lenses sold by INMO ($130, myopia only) | Worn with prescription glasses, safety glasses, or hard hats |
| Weight (g) | 82 | 270 |
| Frame style | glasses | — |
| Foldable | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Battery life (hours) | — | 8 |
| Connectivity | USB-C | USB-C |
| Compatible devices | Android | Standalone |
| Operating system | — | Android 11 (RealWear voice-first UI, WearHF) |
| Chipset | ARM processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (8-core 2.0GHz, Adreno 610), 4GB RAM, 64GB storage |
| Camera | ✕ No | 48MP |
| Speakers | bone-conduction | open-ear |
| Tracking | 3DoF | 3DoF |

Product pages: https://www.arcompare.com/ar-glasses/inmo-go/ · https://www.arcompare.com/ar-glasses/realwear-navigator-520/
Machine records: https://www.arcompare.com/data/products/inmo-go.json · https://www.arcompare.com/data/products/realwear-navigator-520.json