# Brilliant Labs Halo AI Glasses vs INMO GO3 AI Translation Glasses

Canonical comparison page: https://www.arcompare.com/compare/brilliant-labs-halo-vs-inmo-go3/
Specs updated: 2026-10-06 (the newer of the two products' update dates)
Source: AR Compare spec database (https://www.arcompare.com/data/). Unknown values are "—", never guessed.

**Bottom line: the Brilliant Labs Halo AI Glasses is the better buy for most people at $200 less.**

- Buy the Brilliant Labs Halo AI Glasses if you want to spend $200 less ($399 vs $599), you want the lighter 40g fit (vs 58g), you need longer battery life (14 hours vs 3), and you want a built-in camera.

## Specifications

| Spec | Brilliant Labs Halo AI Glasses | INMO GO3 AI Translation Glasses |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | $399 | $599 |
| Optics type | — | waveguide |
| Prescription support | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Diopter range | yes, via SmartBuyGlasses partnership; display optic itself adjusts +2 to -6 D | Clip-in Rx lenses ($95, INMO); myopia to -16.00D / astigmatism to -4.00D by index (no hyperopia or presbyopia) |
| Weight (g) | 40 | 58 |
| Foldable | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Battery life (hours) | 14 | 3 |
| Compatible devices | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
| Operating system | Noa AI agent with agentic long-term 'narrative memory'; Vibe Mode voice-coded mini apps | INMO app; HERE Maps turn-by-turn walking/cycling navigation |
| Chipset | Alif Ensemble B1 (Cortex-M55 + Ethos NPU) for on-device AI; Liquid AI LFM2-VL-450M vision-language model on-device | phone-tethered AI; 98-language real-time translation |
| Camera | 640x480 (0.3MP, global shutter) | ✕ No |
| Speakers | bone-conduction | open-ear |
| Tracking | 0DoF | 0DoF |

Product pages: https://www.arcompare.com/ar-glasses/brilliant-labs-halo/ · https://www.arcompare.com/ar-glasses/inmo-go3/
Machine records: https://www.arcompare.com/data/products/brilliant-labs-halo.json · https://www.arcompare.com/data/products/inmo-go3.json