# Brilliant Labs Frame vs INMO GO3 AI Translation Glasses

Canonical comparison page: https://www.arcompare.com/compare/brilliant-labs-frame-vs-inmo-go3/
Specs updated: 2026-10-06 (the newer of the two products' update dates)
Source: AR Compare spec database (https://www.arcompare.com/data/). Unknown values are "—", never guessed.

**Bottom line: the Brilliant Labs Frame is the better buy for most people at $250 less.**

- Buy the Brilliant Labs Frame if you want to spend $250 less ($349 vs $599), you want the lighter 40g fit (vs 58g), you need longer battery life (4 hours vs 3), and you want a built-in camera.

## Specifications

| Spec | Brilliant Labs Frame | INMO GO3 AI Translation Glasses |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | $349 | $599 |
| Optics type | prism | waveguide |
| Prescription support | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Diopter range | -6 to +2 | Clip-in Rx lenses ($95, INMO); myopia to -16.00D / astigmatism to -4.00D by index (no hyperopia or presbyopia) |
| Weight (g) | 40 | 58 |
| Frame style | round classic | — |
| Color options | Clear, Grey | — |
| Foldable | ✓ Yes | ✕ No |
| Battery life (hours) | 4 | 3 |
| Charging method | USB-C via Mister Power charging dock | — |
| Charging time (min) | 1 | — |
| Connectivity | Bluetooth 5.3 | — |
| Tethered | ✕ No | — |
| Compatible devices | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
| Processing type | phone | — |
| Operating system | open-source (Noa firmware) | INMO app; HERE Maps turn-by-turn walking/cycling navigation |
| Chipset | Nordic nRF52840 + Lattice FPGA | phone-tethered AI; 98-language real-time translation |
| Camera | 720p | ✕ No |
| Microphones | 1 | — |
| Speakers | ✕ No | open-ear |
| Tracking | — | 0DoF |
| Voice control | ✓ Yes | — |
| AI assistant | Noa AI (open-source) | — |

Product pages: https://www.arcompare.com/ar-glasses/brilliant-labs-frame/ · https://www.arcompare.com/ar-glasses/inmo-go3/
Machine records: https://www.arcompare.com/data/products/brilliant-labs-frame.json · https://www.arcompare.com/data/products/inmo-go3.json